tirsdag den 25. oktober 2022

City of Joy in the midst of the horrors of war

 All adults - including young adults (16+) - are recommended to watch this film, which is a unique documentary:

 The focus is on the City of Joy project in eastern Congo, where women who have been subjected to cruel rape are regaining hope and meaning in life.


 The documentary is on Netflix, and as something quite extraordinary, it is allowed to be shown in a teaching context without fees.


Introduction and teaching guide is found here: CITY OF JOY: THE FILM - City of Joy 


 Although the documentary is heartwarming and moving, the women's descriptions of what they have gone through can also be traumatizing for some.  It is recommended to read the considerations in the teaching guide before presenting to groups.



Here are quotes from the "Director's Statement" on the film's website 

CITY OF JOY: THE FILM - City of Joy


Rape as a weapon of war


“The eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo has endured 20 years of devastating violence. It is estimated that up to 8 million people have been murdered and hundreds of thousands of women have been raped and tortured. Rape has been used as a weapon of war in the conscious destruction of community to get at the precious resources in the area. Congo is often referred to as the worst place in the world to be a woman for all these reasons and more. CITY OF JOY tells another story of that region. 

… …”


The awe-inspiring resilience of these women


“… But equally arresting was the palpable resilience of these women. My daughter was young at the time, and I was sure that if I had seen her endure what these women had or if my daughter had witnessed such things, I would collapse and my life would be over, period. The fact that these women could find ways to create meaning in their lives after such experiences was awe-inspiring. This is what initially drew me to this story.”


The director’s balancing act between sufflering and hope


“It was important to me that the audience not go numb in the watching of this film, or be so torn up that they shut down and stopped listening. So the balancing between the devastation of what these women had suffered and the incredible force of hope and joy that they embodied was something I grappled with a lot. The shifting tones between pathos, humor, irreverence, and joy were something I strived for, trying to keep the film visceral and surprising in its emotion and arc.


Methods in use in creating the documentary


“To this end, I used all sorts of methods and found myself inventing things along the way. I tried to create the feeling of nostalgia, shooting visual elements that represented a past world and the subsequent loss of that world. I worked a lot with sound and music and the interaction of these elements. I saw the war as a sort of character of its own that we revisit throughout the film, learning bits and pieces each time. I tried to give enough history but not too much, and I questioned myself constantly in this regard. This was a real challenge and I hope an audience finds it satisfying but this lacing of elements and tonal shifts was very important to me.”



Teach GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP Newsletter no. 48

Everyone, who is engaged in developing global citizenship, is welcome to receive these thematic introductions & curated learning possibilities. 
December 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark
Egon Hedegaard

Links to all previous blog posts: click 




mandag den 3. oktober 2022

How do you show respect for a person's name?

This blog post is for teachers, students and everyone meeting anyone for the first time.


The aim is not to give definitive answers, but to raise awareness of this issue and to open a discussion.

 

I once had a toe-curling experience where people with ethnic names were not shown respect:

 

All new students in a Danish college were gathered for the start of intro activities, and a division into groups was underway. A student called out the names of each group's participants and they had to respond that they were present.

 

The first time he came across a name that wasn't typically Danish, he messed with it and mispronounced it. It caused a bit of a laugh, and one girl said "Maybe it's me you mean" which led to more laughter. About a third of all the new students had names that were not typically Danish.

 

Every time the announcer came up with a name of ethnic origin other than Danish, he mumbled something, which caused laughter every time, and in the end he himself almost gave up being serious and was laughing along.

 

Although it was he, who was laughed at, the worst part was that it was apparent that everyone who did not have a Danish name just didn't fit in, was strange in some way and maybe even had a ridiculous name.

 

There were many of us who curled our toes and didn't laugh along. But none of us did anything. What could we have done? What do you do the next time something similar happens?

 


I have chosen to pass on this series of slides created by a young man in London because he has given you many constructive thoughts on this very question.

 

He has also made a 12-minute video introduction which is available on YouTube. Click here 

 






Not everyone likes the name given to them by their parents.

The worst example I know is two brothers who were named by their Kenyan father after their father's great role models. The father was a passionate Stalinist, so nothing could be better than naming the baby boys after Lenin and Stalin. One was named Vladimir Illich, and the other Joseph. They naturally got the family's African name as their surname; it cannot be otherwise in Kenya.

 

The father ended up as a disillusioned and angry man who lived alone in a cabin. The sons developed in completely different directions than the father had imagined. Vladimir Illich is now a successful businessman, but he had changed his name long before that. Joseph is now a bishop, and his name with biblical roots fits the job well.

 

Summa summarum: Isn't it okay - after asking “What's your name?” and repeating the name, then asking “Is that what you'd like to be called?”

 


I have a neighbor with a Chinese background. When I get an SMS from her, the sender is "Victoria / Xia". I've tried to learn to pronounce Xia correctly, but I didn't succeed, she says. She has given up on teaching Danes to pronounce it correctly, so she says, "Call me Victoria".

Is it wrong to accept Victoria / Xia's own proposal?


 


It is a good idea to add the names of those, you write to, in your word processor's memory. It's an easy way to make sure you respect the name when writing to someone.

 


It is a fact that "Naming practices by European colonizers served to inject a sense of shame and legacy of inferiority", but it is not true that Africans were "left nameless". Parents who are Christians traditionally give their children names from the Bible as their baptismal names, but the surname that they are given is the surname of the family, often marking extensive kinship relations. So, the children become attached both to the parents' faith and the family to which they will always belong.

 

Deepening about languages: “A language dies every 14 days” Click 

 


I return to the toe-curling experience where people with ethnic names were not shown respect (as told in the beginning of this blogpost):

 

If there is a next time, I will say: "I have a small suggestion: When your name is called, please, repeat your name and say e.g., "Peter Jensen here" or "Abdulrazak Gurnah here", then we may respect everyone’s name, because you live in your name!"

 

What would you say?

 

 

More resources:

 

- How to Respect my Ethnic Name (12 minutes, YouTube video), click 


- All 11 slides of “How to Respect my ethnic name” by Anpu as pdf in printer friendly version, full color, text only and braille. Klick https://www.anpu.london/name


 


Teach GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP Newsletter no. 47

Everyone, who is engaged in developing global citizenship, is welcome to receive these thematic introductions & curated learning possibilities. 
October 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark
Egon Hedegaard

Thanks goes to Gary Fink for proof reading.

Links to all previous blog posts: click 



onsdag den 29. juni 2022

Dialogue is the answer when the questions are …

How to counteract hate speech?

How to help someone out of extremism or cult-like groups?

How do you clean up your house before teaching others about democracy?


Opening of anew highway bridge in Denmark: Only for pedestrians and runners on the first day

 

1.

How to counteract hate speech?

 

A courageous answer is given by the Danish former member of parliament Özlem Cekic in a TED talk called "Why I drink coffee with people who send me hate emails".

 


2.

How to help someone out of extremism or cult-like groups?

 

Both research and many people's practical experience show that the most important thing is that there is dialogue between the individual inside the cult or extremist group and someone outside. Without contact with anyone outside, the isolation becomes total and the group feeds off its internal beliefs even more so.

 

Nafees Hamid, who researches extremism, writes that the best thing you can do if you know someone who is - or is about to become radicalized - is to stay in touch even if you may experience through several years that the radical views are not up for discussion. One day, your contact may be the way out of radicalization.

 

Link to Nafees Hamid´s article

 

 

3.

How do you clean up your own house) before teaching others about democracy?

 

There is a need for regular review of the actually functioning rules for communication in contexts in which you are involved. A dialogue can lead you to opening your eyes to something that you have to deal with. At a school where I worked, such a review resulted in a new rule called: "No more eyes turned up to heaven when colleagues you disagree with speak, because here we are always listening and arguing!"

 

Another example is a new initiative - called a democratic initiative - from all political youth departments in political parties in Denmark (11) from the far right to the far left. These basic values are all under the headline  … 

 

"Let us clean up our own house before we teach other countries about democracy”

 

The agreed set of values goes as follows:

 

“Five prerequisites for democracies to continue to thrive:

 

1. Cross-political respect between the parties

2. An open and welcoming public debate with respect for young people

3. Democracy is something we do every day

4. The understanding of the influence of each voice

5.  Politics is not just about winning and getting enough votes - it is about developing society and democracy."

 

Source: “Lad os feje for egen dør før vi belærer andre om demokrati” (article in Danish) (Translation: “Let us sweep around our own front door before we lecture others countries about democracy”)

 

 

Recommendations for further reading

 

Regarding the answer to the question “How to counter hate speech?

 

Özlem Cekic has started “Brobyggerne” (“Bridge builders”). An association that trains bridge builders, makes events where students in Jewish and Muslim schools in Denmark get to know each other and much more.

 

Home page in Danish 

 

Homepage in English


https://www.amazon.com/Overcoming-Hate-Through-Dialogue-Understanding_and/dp/1642503762/ref=as_li_tf_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0520271440&linkCode=as2&tag=teco06-20&asin=B09L15M2ZN&revisionId=f22fc52b&format=1&depth=1


 

Regarding the answer to the question "How to help someone out of extremism or cult-like groups?"

 

Nafees Hamid writes: “What this means is that all of us have to engage with our friends and family who start showing sympathy for insurrectionist violence and ideas. (And other extremes (my comment)) It's tempting to attack them in comments sections of their online posts, to unfollow or unfriend them, to block their numbers, or to stop inviting them to dinner parties. But our findings suggest that these actions may do more harm than good. Instead, try to engage them by using the following guidelines from psychological research. … 

First, talk to them one-on-one either through messaging, voice or video calls, or best yet, face-to-face. Research shows that people not only form more positive attitudes toward those they interact with face-to-face rather than digitally, but they are also more likely to agree with someone they're talking to in real life. …

 

Second, instead of telling them what you think, listen to what they think. Research on asymmetric conflict (where one group is materially stronger than another) shows that asking those on the weaker side to take the perspective of the dominant side often backfires. … ”

 

Source: Link to Nafees Hamid´s article

 

 

 

Regarding the answer to the question “How do you clean up your house before teaching others about democracy?

 

A concrete tool to ensure political inclusion of youth could be Roger A. Hart's "Ladder of participation", that describes different levels of participation in decision-making processes. It moves from situations where youth is being used as decoration to situations where youth is actively participating in decision-making.



“Participation is the fundamental right of citizenship. … An understanding of democratic participation and the confidence and competence to participate can only be acquired gradually through practice; it cannot be taught as an abstraction.”

 

Quote from page 5 in Hart, Roger A.: “Children's participation. From tokenism to participation ”


 


The Danish youth parties' democratic initiatives were facilitated by the Danish Institute for Parties and Democracy, DIPD

"DIPD is a community of parties in the Danish parliament, who believe we can make a difference to the development of democratic societies in the world." Source (and further resources)

 



A concluding reflection

 

It may seem paradoxical to focus on dialogue and democracy now that an era of peace in Europe is over. We thought we were living in a postwar-period here in Europe, but we must realize that we were living in an interwar-period.

 

We thought that the Cold War ended with the fall of the Wall in Berlin in 1989. But perhaps we now see the end of the Cold War in the form of the hot war that Putin started in Ukraine on February 24, 2022.



Anastasia Edel writes in an essay in the New York Times: “For a Russian American like me, whose life has been forged in the interstices between the two cultures, it's a bewildering, sorrowful turn of events. Measures to curtail the Kremlin's capacity of aggression are, to be clear, politically and morally necessary. But the collateral damage is a severing of ties that is bound to revive harmful stereotypes and close down the space for cross-cultural pollination. - More profoundly, the current parting of ways marks the definitive end of a period when Russia’s integration with the West, however vexed, appeared possible — and the antagonism between ideological superpowers was a thing of the past. ... Our post-totalitarian dream of a peaceful, friendly future is over”.  Source

 

The dream of progress for democracy throughout the world has been replaced by a gloomier reality not just in Europe. Lykke Friis, director of the think tank Europa, says:

 

"In 1989, we thought it was the fall of the Wall that was decisive that year, but it turned out to be the events in Beijing rather than Berlin. At the time, we thought the Chinese would become like us. But that did not happen. Their doctrine of the demonstrations at Tiananmen Square was different from the Western doctrine of the fall of the Wall. For the Chinese, it was a warning that democracy is dangerous.” Source

 

Although less than 50% of the world's population lives in democratic societies, and although war and conflict are the characteristics of many places in the world today, dialogue and cooperation are still the only hope for the long term - in some places unfortunately only in a very long term.

 

----------------------------0-------------------------

Link to the annual democracy index, which research and analysis company The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) is behind. Click


Previous Teach GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP Newsletters on simular topics:

 

No. 20: Border-crossers, Mediators & Go-betweens. Don’t we Need More of Them?  click

 

No. 32: Everyone, Everywhere Should Have Someone to Turn to in Support of Their Mental Health click




Teach GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP Newsletter no. 46

Everyone, who is engaged in developing global citizenship, is welcome to receive these thematic introductions & curated learning possibilities. 
June 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark
Egon Hedegaard

Thanks goes to Gary Fink for proof reading.

Links to all blog posts: click 

 



onsdag den 23. februar 2022

The new annual survey on corruption shows the state of the world

Update May 2023: Corruption Peception Index 2022 https://transparency.dk/13418-2/


Update February 2024

Corruption Perceptions Index 2023

https://transparency.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Report_CPI2023_English.pdf


From 2023 index:


As usual 180 countries and territories around the world are ranked in the "Transparency International Corruption Perception Index 2021" from 0 points (very corrupt) to 100 points (very clean) based on assessment of corruption in the public sector.



The information can be summed up like this:
 
1. No surprise at the top: The same countries are at the top as last year
 
Denmark, Finland and New Zealand have a shared 1st place, but note that all 3 countries have only achieved 88 out of 100 points, so there is also room for improvement here.
For example in Denmark: Transparency about donations to political parties and politicians, lobbying, whistleblower protection programs, sextortion & Corona crisis relief fraud. 




 2. The bad news: The state of the world has gotten worse
 
 The global average is 43 points out of 100, which is the same as in ten previous years.
 131 countries have not made progress in the fight against corruption in the last 10 years despite declarations to the contrary.
 In 2021, 27 countries have scored the lowest they have ever done.
 
 The main conclusion is clear: Anti-corruption measures are stagnating at the same time as human rights and democratic rights are under attack, and there is a clear connection between these 3 conditions in many states.
 
 3. The good news: The fight against corruption continues nonetheless
 
All over the world, local branches of Transparency International and other grassroots organizations are fighting the corruption they are experiencing in their communities.
Here is teaching materials that shows an example of this from Ghana:



-  "WHEN LOCAL GRASS ROOTS FIGHT INJUSTICE"
 The Ghana Integrity Initiative fights corruption in all its forms.  The Counseling Center urges citizens to reject bribery and report corruption cases.


This video is supplemented by 4 others that make up teaching material for high school students but can be used by many more. (See links below)


Afterword

Many years ago I was admitted to a hospital in Afghanistan with amoeba dysentery.  The hospital room with 15 hospitalized men in rickety metal beds was ruled by a chiefly-sized Afghan man with a skullcap and scarf.  He sat most of the day tending to the stove while smoking cannabis.  You had to buy medicine in the city by yourself, the chief distributed water and food which was mostly overcooked spinach, but it was only to those who gave him a "baksheesh" (gift) in the form of some Afghan coins.  Luckily, I had friends who provided me with what I needed so I was able to refuse to accept corruption.
 
Later we drove through traffic lights at an intersection in Kabul.  We were stopped by an police officer who said "Red light, you pay 1,000 Afghans!".  We said, "Green light, no Afghans!".  He kept going and saying, "You go police station all day!"  … Finally, we said "Maybe yellow light, 500 Afghans".  He immediately closed the fine book and stuffed the 500 Afghans in his pocket.
 
Not long ago on an early morning, I was a passenger in a colleague’s car on a highway outside the suburb of Karen in Nairobi, Kenya.  Suddenly there was a long queue, and the traffic came to a complete stop.  She said it was probably police officers who procured an extra income.  And quite right.  As we reached a police checkpoint, a police officer stuck a hand in through the window, and my colleague placed some rolled-up notes in his hand, and then we were waved forward.
 I asked "Did you have to do this?"  She replied “Otherwise we had been waved aside, and in the end we still had to pay.  Everyone knows that this is how police officers get a better salary, even though it is denied by the politicians at the top who say they are fighting corruption.”


Karen Blixen Museum, Karen Rd., Nairobi, Kenya

 It is difficult not to accept corruption when you are in a pinch in everyday life. But I have come across encouraging examples of how organizations - in addition to grassroots organizations - can create success in denying acceptance of corruption.
 
For example, an international shipowners' association has drastically reduced the number of situations in which attempts are made to demand corruption money. 
 
It has happened by creating a new culture with the motto: We are just far better at negotiating than those who demand corruption. The method was training of all captains and officers in ways to live up to this motto.

A new tradition for negotiating with port authorities has been created. The captain himself always shows up in full monty when negotiating starts. There are also always other officers present as witnesses, and if that is not enough, then they record on video as documentation of the situation of extortion.  They always have a protocol for who to contact immediately, if necessary, as well at their own countries' embassies as high up in the administration of the country whose port they are in. 


 The fight against corruption is about cultural change, rule of law, and long development processes that never quite ends.
 
See elaboration in my article from 2019: 
Fighting corruption – how? (10 minutes reading)

 

Content:

 

1. Corruption is a cancerous disease to be eradicated

 

2. Corruption prevention is one of the bright sides of nationalism

 

3. How did Denmark become the least corrupt country? 

 

4. Corruption will never be completely abolished - our democratic values are not self-evident

 


More recommended teaching materials for high school students and others

 

Five short documentaries about corruption and how it negatively affects society on all levels in a developing country. The example here is Ghana.

 



 

 The Challenges of modern democracy  (10 min.) YouTube version

 

When local grass roots are combatting justice (8 min.) YouTube version

 

Cases of corruption in the educational system (7 min.) YouTube version  

 



 











Everyday life in Ghana (7 min) YouTube version  

 

How to say no to unfair business (9 min.) YouTube version  

 


 More relevant links:

 

- See elaboration of  “Perceived levels of public sector corruption”

 

- Here is an elaboration of “No surprise at the top”: “CPI 2021 Trouble at the TOP” 

 

- “CPI 2021: Corruption, Human rights and democracy”

 

- How to join a national chapter of Transparency International


Du kan læse en version af denne blogpost  på dansk (med links) her



Teach GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP Newsletter no. 45

Everyone, who is engaged in developing global citizenship, is welcome to receive these thematic introductions & curated learning possibilities. 
February 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark
Egon Hedegaard

Thanks goes to Gary Fink for proof reading.

Links to all blog posts: click 

 


 

Thank you for reading my 50 blog posts over the past 12 years (or some of them)

    This post will be the last one on this blog  Teach GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP .    I stop my professional educational activities now. At 74, I a...